š Cloud Virtual Machines vs. Serverless Functions: What Should You Use?
- Avishag Sahar
- 6 days ago
- 3 min read
When building modern applications in the cloud, choosing the right compute model can make or break your architecture. Should you go with Virtual Machines (VMs)Ā like AWS EC2 or GCP Compute Engine? Or embrace the speed and simplicity of Serverless FunctionsĀ like AWS Lambda or Google Cloud Functions?
Letās break it down!
āļø What Are Cloud Virtual Machines?
Cloud Virtual Machines are virtualized servers in the cloud that mimic traditional on-premise hardware. Instead of buying them (like car purchase), you rent them (like car leasing).
You get full control over the operating system, installed software, network configuration, and more.
Think of them as your own remote computer in a data center.
Popular services:
AWS EC2
Google Compute Engine
Azure Virtual Machines
ā Advantages of Virtual Machines:
Full controlĀ over the environment (OS, libraries, runtimes)
Persistent storageĀ and IP addresses
Long-running processesĀ are supported (e.g., background jobs)
Ideal for legacy appsĀ or systems that canāt be refactored
Can run any workload - from web servers to game engines
ā Disadvantages:
More DevOps overhead: you handle updates, security patches, and scaling
Slow startup timeĀ (minutes vs. milliseconds)
You pay for uptime š°, even if the app is idle
Less cost-efficient for sporadic or bursty workloads
ā”ļø What Are Serverless Functions?
Serverless Functions (also known as Functions-as-a-Service or FaaS) abstract away the server entirely. You simply write a function that responds to events - HTTP requests, database changes, file uploads, etc.
Popular services:
AWS Lambda
Google Cloud Functions
Azure Functions
ā Advantages of Serverless Functions:
No server managementĀ // deploy code, and you're done
Automatic scalingĀ // from zero to millions of requests
Pay-as-you-goĀ // youāre charged only when the function runs
Fast deploymentĀ and easier for small, focused services
Great for event-drivenĀ architectures and microservices
ā Disadvantages:
Limited execution timeĀ (e.g., max 15 minutes per invocation)
StatelessĀ // you canāt store data in-memory between runs
Cold startsĀ // some delay when scaling from zero
Harder to debug with no direct access to the OS or file system
Not suitable for heavy, persistent workloads
š TL;DR Table
Feature | Virtual Machines | Serverless Functions |
Infrastructure | You manage it | Fully abstracted |
Startup Time | Minutes | Millisecondsāseconds |
Runtime | Unlimited | Time-limited |
State | Can be stateful | Stateless |
Scaling | Manual or configured | Automatic |
Cost | Pay per uptime | Pay per execution |
Use Case | General-purpose workloads | Event-driven, short-lived functions |
š¤ When Should You Use Each?
Your Scenario | Choose |
Youāre running a web server 24/7 | VM |
You need full OS control (e.g., custom drivers) | VM |
Youāre processing file uploads or running short scripts | Serverless |
Youāre building APIs or microservices | Serverless |
Youāre migrating a legacy app | VM |
You want to scale quickly with minimal effort | Serverless |
Your app needs to maintain local state | VM |
Those will indicate whether you should use VM or Serverless. But in order to be more precise, one should predict the many factors to make the right decision:
Estimated trafficĀ // Is it high, low, or highly variable?
Response rateĀ // How fast must the system respond under load?
Startup time toleranceĀ // Can you afford cold starts (common in serverless)?
Execution durationĀ // Are tasks short-lived or long-running?
and more...
TL;DR:
If youāre building a long-running, complex application - go with VMs.Ā If you want to move fast and focus purely on business logic - go serverless.
š§ Hybrid Architectures
You donāt always have to choose one over the other. Many modern applications use a hybrid approach:
Run your main app on a VM or container (Cloud Run, Kubernetes)
Use serverless functions for async tasks, triggers, or APIs
This lets you balance control, performance, and cost-efficiency.
š©āš» Letās Wrap It Up
Both Virtual Machines and Serverless Functions are powerful in their own right. The best choice depends on your workload, scalability needs, and how much infrastructure you want to manage.
Want help deciding which fits your next project? DM me or drop a comment - happy to help & Shabbat Shalom! š¬
š The Hackerista
Comments